State Dog Bite Law

Dog bite law in all 50 states and D.C., cited to the statute and dated

Every state checked against its statutes, October 2026

Dog bite law by state

Who pays for a dog bite depends on where it happened. In 22 jurisdictions a statute makes the owner liable without proof that they knew the dog was dangerous; 16 have a statute that does this only in some situations; 13 still use the one-bite rule and negligence. Each state has two pages: the law for people who were bitten, and the dangerous-dog law for owners.

51 jurisdictions, 102 state pages

Liability rule and deadline to sue for a dog bite, by state
StateLiability ruleDeadlineOwner's side
AlabamaPartial§ 3-6-1 drops the knowledge requirement only for bites on the owner's property; elsewhere you must prove knowledge or negligence.2 yearsDangerous dog law
AlaskaOne-bite ruleNo dog bite statute; owners are liable if they knew of a dangerous tendency (Hale v. O'Neill, 1971) or were negligent.2 yearsDangerous dog law
ArizonaStrict liabilityA.R.S. § 11-1025: owner liable for bites in public or where the victim was lawfully present; § 11-1020 covers dogs at large.1 yearDangerous dog law
ArkansasOne-bite ruleNo dog bite statute; owner strictly liable only if they knew or should have known the dog was vicious, else negligence.3 yearsDangerous dog law
CaliforniaStrict liabilityCivil Code § 3342 makes the owner liable for bites in public or lawfully on private property, without proof of known danger.2 yearsDangerous dog law
ColoradoPartialStatute removes the knowledge requirement only for bites causing serious bodily injury or death, and only for economic damages.2 yearsDangerous dog law
ConnecticutStrict liability§ 22-357 makes the owner or keeper liable for any damage the dog does, unless the victim was trespassing or teasing it.3 yearsDangerous dog law
DelawareStrict liabilityOwner or keeper liable for any injury or loss the dog causes; exceptions for trespassers, criminals and teasing.2 yearsDangerous dog law
District of ColumbiaPartialOwner's lack of knowledge is no defense if the dog injured you while at large; otherwise one-bite rule and negligence.3 yearsDangerous dog law
FloridaStrict liability§ 767.04 makes owners liable for bites without proof of prior viciousness; a “Bad Dog” sign defense covers victims 6 and up.2 yearsDangerous dog law
GeorgiaPartialOwner liable if they knew the dog was dangerous; a local leash-law violation replaces that proof (O.C.G.A. § 51-2-7).2 yearsDangerous dog law
HawaiiOne-bite ruleHRS § 663-9 (1980) removed the need to prove the owner knew the dog was dangerous; you must still prove negligence.2 yearsDangerous dog law
IdahoStrict liabilityIdaho Code § 25-2810(11) (2016): owner or custodian liable for unprovoked injury to a non-trespasser; no prior bite needed.2 yearsDangerous dog law
IllinoisStrict liabilityAnimal Control Act § 16: owner or keeper liable for an unprovoked attack on a peaceable person lawfully present.2 yearsDangerous dog law
IndianaPartialStrict liability only for bites of on-duty public servants (IC 15-20-1-3); others need scienter or negligence.2 yearsDangerous dog law
IowaStrict liabilityIowa Code § 351.28: the legal owner is liable for any attack or attempted bite unless the victim's unlawful act contributed.2 yearsDangerous dog law
KansasOne-bite ruleNo dog bite statute; owner liable if they knew of the dog's dangerous propensity or were negligent (Berry v. Kegans, 1966).2 yearsDangerous dog law
KentuckyStrict liabilityKRS 258.235(4) makes the owner (incl. keeper or harborer) liable for damage the dog causes; fault reduces the award.1 yearDangerous dog law
LouisianaStrict liabilityCivil Code art. 2321 makes dog owners strictly liable unless provoked; the victim must show an unreasonable risk of harm.2 yearsDangerous dog law
MainePartialOwner or keeper liable without fault if you were off their premises (7 M.R.S. § 3961(2)); on their premises, negligence.6 yearsDangerous dog law
MarylandPartialOwner presumed to know the dog was dangerous (rebuttable); strictly liable only if the dog was running at large.3 yearsDangerous dog law
MassachusettsStrict liabilityOwner or keeper liable for any damage the dog does (G.L. c. 140, § 155) unless the victim was trespassing or teasing it.3 yearsDangerous dog law
MichiganStrict liabilityMCL 287.351: owner liable for an unprovoked bite in a public place or lawfully on private property; bites only.3 yearsDangerous dog law
MinnesotaStrict liabilityMinn. Stat. § 347.22: owner, keeper or harborer liable when the dog attacks or injures a peaceable person lawfully present.6 yearsDangerous dog law
MississippiOne-bite ruleNo dog bite statute; you must show the owner knew or should have known of the dog's dangerous propensity (Poy v. Grayson).3 yearsDangerous dog law
MissouriStrict liabilityOwner or possessor strictly liable for unprovoked bites in public or where lawfully present (RSMo § 273.036, 2009).5 yearsDangerous dog law
MontanaPartialMont. Code Ann. § 27-1-715: owner liable for unprovoked bites regardless of knowledge, but only in incorporated cities and towns.3 yearsDangerous dog law
NebraskaStrict liabilityNeb. Rev. Stat. § 54-601: the owner is liable for bites to anyone but a trespasser; deliberate provocation bars a claim.4 yearsDangerous dog law
NevadaOne-bite ruleNo civil dog bite statute; owners answer in negligence. NRS 202.500 covers dangerous and vicious dogs only as a crime.2 yearsDangerous dog law
New HampshireStrict liabilityOwner, keeper or possessor liable for any damage the dog causes (RSA 466:19) unless the victim was trespassing or in a tort.3 yearsDangerous dog law
New JerseyStrict liabilityN.J.S.A. 4:19-16 makes the owner liable for bites in public or lawfully on private property, without proof of knowledge.2 yearsDangerous dog law
New MexicoOne-bite ruleNo dog bite statute; owner liable if they knew or should have known the dog was vicious, or under negligence.3 yearsDangerous dog law
New YorkPartialStrict liability by statute only for medical costs caused by a dog already declared dangerous; otherwise scienter or negligence.3 yearsDangerous dog law
North CarolinaPartialStrict liability only for a dog that was already a "dangerous dog" (§ 67-4.4); otherwise owner knowledge or negligence.3 yearsDangerous dog law
North DakotaOne-bite ruleNo dog bite statute; Sendelbach v. Grad (1976): owner knew or should have known of danger and failed to use ordinary care.6 yearsDangerous dog law
OhioStrict liabilityR.C. 955.28 makes the owner, keeper or harborer liable for any injury the dog causes, with trespass and teasing exceptions.2 yearsDangerous dog law
OklahomaPartialOwner liable without fault in towns with city mail delivery (4 O.S. § 42.1); rural bites use one-bite and negligence rules.2 yearsDangerous dog law
OregonPartialOne-bite rule and negligence; ORS 609.115 adds strict liability for economic loss once a court finds a dog potentially dangerous.2 yearsDangerous dog law
PennsylvaniaPartialOwner or keeper must pay the victim's medical costs (3 P.S. § 459-502(b)); other damages need scienter or negligence.2 yearsDangerous dog law
Rhode IslandPartialStrict liability on the highway or outside the owner's enclosure (§ 4-13-16); inside it, the one-bite rule applies.3 yearsDangerous dog law
South CarolinaStrict liability§ 47-3-110 makes the owner or keeper liable for a bite or attack in public or lawfully on private property; no prior-bite proof.3 yearsDangerous dog law
South DakotaOne-bite ruleNo dog bite statute; owners are liable in negligence, and a known dangerous propensity proves it (Gehrts v. Batteen, 2001).3 yearsDangerous dog law
TennesseePartialStatute removes the knowledge requirement off the owner's home or farm; on that property the one-bite rule applies.1 yearDangerous dog law
TexasOne-bite ruleNo civil dog bite statute; owner liable if they knew or should have known the dog was dangerous, or was negligent.2 yearsDangerous dog law
UtahStrict liabilityUtah Code § 18-1-1: owner or keeper liable for any injury the dog causes; comparative fault reduces the award.3 yearsDangerous dog law
VermontOne-bite ruleNo dog bite statute; the owner or keeper is liable only if they knew or had reason to know the dog was dangerous (Martin, 2014).3 yearsDangerous dog law
VirginiaOne-bite ruleNo civil dog bite statute; owner liable if they knew of the dog's dangerous propensity or failed to use ordinary care.2 yearsDangerous dog law
WashingtonStrict liabilityRCW 16.08.040 makes the owner liable for bites in public or on private property with consent; other injuries need proof of fault.3 yearsDangerous dog law
West VirginiaPartialW. Va. Code § 19-20-13 makes owners liable without proof of knowledge only when they let the dog run at large.2 yearsDangerous dog law
WisconsinStrict liabilityWis. Stat. § 174.02: owner, keeper or harborer liable for any injury the dog causes; double after a prior scarring bite.3 yearsDangerous dog law
WyomingOne-bite ruleNo dog bite statute; owner liable if they knew of the dog's dangerous propensity or were negligent (Borns v. Voss, 2003).4 yearsDangerous dog law

Why the same bite can be worth suing for in one state and not the next

Under the old common-law rule, a dog owner answers for a bite only if they knew, or should have known, that the dog was dangerous. Most states have replaced that rule with a statute, but the statutes differ: some cover only bites, some any injury a dog causes; some protect only people in public places or lawfully on private property; a few limit what the victim can recover. Deadlines run from one to six years. The full comparison sets the rules side by side, and the claim checker applies your state's rule to your facts.