South Carolina Dog Bite Law
South Carolina dog bite law makes the dog's owner, and anyone who has the dog in their care or keeping, liable when the dog bites or otherwise attacks a person who is in a public place or lawfully on private property, and you have three years to sue1,7. No prior bite or owner knowledge has to be shown; the statute's main defense is that the injured person provoked the dog1,2.
Key rules in South Carolina
| Liability rule | Strict liability by statute for bites and other attacksS.C. Code § 47-3-110; Hossenlopp v. Cannon (1985).1,2 |
|---|---|
| Who is liable | The owner, or the person with the dog in their care or keepingEither may be sued, Harris (2009).1,3 |
| Deadline to sue | 3 years from the attackS.C. Code § 15-3-530(5).7 |
| Bitten child | Later of 3 years after the bite or the 19th birthday§ 15-3-40: no more than one year after age 18.7 |
| Your own fault | Barred only if your fault is greater than the defendant'sNelson v. Concrete Supply Co. (1991).6 |
| Claim against a city, county or the State | 2 years, or 3 if a verified claim is filed first; cappedS.C. Code §§ 15-78-110, -120.8 |
| Rabies quarantine | At least 10 days, at home or a designated shelterS.C. Code § 47-5-100.10 |
| Dangerous-animal insurance | $50,000 liability insurance or surety bondS.C. Code § 47-3-760(E).1 |
General information about South Carolina law, checked against the statutes and court decisions listed under Sources. It is not legal advice. South Carolina dangerous dog law covers the owner's side: reports, quarantine, hearings and euthanasia.
How dog bite liability works in South Carolina
South Carolina dropped the one-bite rule in 1985. In Hossenlopp v. Cannon the Supreme Court adopted what it called the "California rule," a quasi-strict liability that needs no proof the owner knew of a vicious propensity2. The General Assembly wrote the same rule into Section 47-3-110 in 1986, and the Court of Appeals has said the statute "codified the holding" of Hossenlopp1,2.
The statute reaches further than many strict-liability laws. It covers a person "bitten or otherwise attacked," not only bites, and it names two defendants: the owner and the "person having the dog in the person's care or keeping"1. In Harris v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office (2009), a veterinary technologist mauled by a boarded police dog was allowed to sue the dog's owner, the sheriff's office, and the Supreme Court refused to create a kennel-worker exception3. South Carolina has no veterinarian's rule.
The limits are narrow. The victim must be in a public place or lawfully on private property, which the statute defines as there by express or implied invitation or to perform a legal duty, such as a mail carrier1. Provocation that was the proximate cause of the attack defeats the claim, and a 2013 amendment exempts police dogs only when six conditions are met, never for a bystander1.
Landlords sit outside the statute. A landlord who does not care for or keep a tenant's dog is not liable, even knowing the dog is dangerous4,5. Compare South Carolina with its neighbors on the national table: North Carolina imposes strict liability only for dogs already found dangerous, and Georgia uses a narrower statute.
The South Carolina dog bite statute
If a person is bitten or otherwise attacked by a dog while in a public place or lawfully in a private place, including the dog owner's own property, the owner or the person having the dog in their care or keeping is liable for the damages suffered1. A person is lawfully on private property when there by express or implied invitation of the owner, a lawful tenant or a resident, or to perform a duty imposed by state, local or federal law, including postal rules1. The statute does not apply when the victim provoked or harassed the dog and that was the proximate cause of the attack, or to a qualifying police dog1. The injured person may sue the owner even while someone else was keeping the dog3.
- Law: S.C. Code Ann. § 47-3-110 (Liability for attacks by dogs), enacted 1986; last changed 2013 (Act No. 62, eff. June 12, 2013: police-dog exemption with six conditions)
- Injuries covered: Any injury the dog causes (bites, knock-downs, chases)
- Where: Public places, or lawfully on private property
- Who is liable: The owner, or a keeper or harborer
- Damages: All damages, under the ordinary rules
Other ways to prove liability
Before 1985, South Carolina required proof that the dog had a dangerous propensity the owner knew or should have known about2. Hossenlopp v. Cannon, 285 S.C. 367, 329 S.E.2d 438 (1985), replaced that rule with quasi-strict liability, but kept a requirement of ownership and control of the dog or the premises when the injury happens on private property2. Negligence remains available alongside the statute: in Nesbitt the jury heard both negligence and § 47-3-110 claims against the owners2. A keeper who breaks a county or city ordinance that adopted the state's running-at-large or vicious-dog penalties commits a misdemeanor, which can support a negligence per se argument1. The statute is the main route for a lawful visitor; common law matters for trespassers and claims against people who are not owners or keepers.
Defenses owners raise
- Provocation
- No statutory liability if the person attacked provoked or harassed the dog and the provocation was the proximate cause of the attack1. Whether a visitor provoked the dog is a jury question; in Nesbitt v. Lewis there was no evidence of provocation and the statute "mandates awarding" damages2.
- Trespassing
- The statute protects only people in a public place or lawfully on private property1. A visitor who is at least a licensee, present with the owner's consent, is lawfully there2. A trespasser falls outside § 47-3-110 and must rely on common law, under which a landowner owes a trespasser a much narrower duty.
- Police dogs
- Since June 12, 2013 a police dog is exempt only if it acted in direct compliance with a certified handler's lawful command, was certified to Law Enforcement Training Council standards, the agency had a written canine policy that was followed, the force was not excessive, and the victim was not a third-party bystander1.
- Veterinarians and dog professionals
- No veterinarian's or kennel-worker exception. In Harris v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office (2009), the Supreme Court held that a clinic employee bitten by a boarded dog could sue its owner and said any such exception is for the Legislature3.
- Other defense
- Not the owner or keeper. A relative who part-owns the house but does not care for, keep or control the dog is not liable, under the statute or at common law2,4.
Shared fault
Modified comparative fault (barred at 51%) (Nelson v. Concrete Supply Co., 303 S.C. 243, 399 S.E.2d 783 (1991)).
For claims arising on or after July 1, 1991, a plaintiff in a negligence action may recover if their negligence "is not greater than that of the defendant"; damages are reduced by the plaintiff's share and a plaintiff more than 50% at fault recovers nothing6. This is court-made, not a statute. Section 47-3-110 names only provocation that proximately caused the attack as a defense, and no South Carolina appellate court has decided whether a victim's ordinary carelessness that falls short of provocation reduces a statutory award1. In a negligence claim it does.
How the five fault systems compare: provocation, trespass and shared fault.
South Carolina dog bite statute of limitations
3 years (S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-530(5))
An action for any injury to the person must be brought within three years7. Damage to property, such as a pet hurt by a dog, also has a three-year period under § 15-3-530(4)7. A claim against a state agency, county or city under the Tort Claims Act must be filed within two years, or three years if a verified claim was first filed with the agency8.
Children. Time while the child is under 18 is not counted, but the deadline cannot be extended to more than one year after the 18th birthday, so a child has until the later of three years after the bite or age 197. The same rule applies to Tort Claims Act cases7,8.
Work out your own date with the dog bite claim checker, or compare deadlines in every state.
Damages
The statute makes the owner or keeper liable for "the damages suffered," with no cap: medical costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, scarring and other actual damages1. Punitive damages require clear and convincing proof of willful, wanton or reckless conduct; Nesbitt reversed an award against owners whose dogs were kept in a fenced yard and left open whether punitive damages are ever available under § 47-3-1102. Where allowed, punitive damages are generally capped at the greater of three times compensatory damages or $500,0009. A claim against a government entity is capped at $300,000 per person and $600,000 per occurrence, with no punitive damages8. A person convicted under the dangerous-animal article must also pay the victim's medical expenses1.
Landlords and property owners
South Carolina is one of the clearest no-liability states for landlords. In Mitchell v. Bazzle (1991) the Court of Appeals refused to hold a landlord liable for a tenant's dog even where the landlord knew of its vicious propensities and could end the lease, and in Fair v. United States (1999) the Supreme Court held that the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act's "fit and habitable" duty covers only the physical premises, not a tenant's dog4. The Supreme Court answered that question for a dog bite on leased premises at a military base5. Bruce v. Durney (2000) applied the same rule to a parent who let his daughter's family live on his land: he did not care for, keep or control the dog, so he was not liable under § 47-3-110 either4. A landlord who takes over the care and keeping of the dog can be liable as a keeper1,3.
Insurance
We found no South Carolina statute that limits insurers' use of dog breed in homeowners or renters underwriting. The owner of an animal that meets the state's "dangerous animal" definition must register it with county law enforcement and show liability insurance or a surety bond of at least $50,0001.
More on coverage, breed exclusions and renters policies: dog bite insurance.
Bitten at the vet, groomer or kennel
Many states bar or limit claims by veterinarians, groomers and kennel staff bitten by dogs in their care. South Carolina does not. In Harris v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office, 381 S.C. 357, 673 S.E.2d 423 (2009), a police dog with a history of attacks was boarded at a veterinary clinic while its handler was on vacation and severely injured a veterinary technologist3. The trial court held that only the clinic, as keeper, could be liable. The Supreme Court reversed: the statute's "owner ... or other person having the dog in his care or keeping" lets the injured person sue the owner even while someone else is keeping the dog3. It declined to adopt a California-style "kennel worker exception," calling that a policy choice for the Legislature, and none has been enacted1,3. The 2013 amendment that followed exempts police dogs on duty only under six conditions; a boarded dog at a clinic is not working1. Whether the worker's employer, as keeper, also bears liability and how fault is split between owner and keeper were left open3.
Bite reports and quarantine
Every physician who treats a bite by a pet or other animal must report it to the county health department by the end of the next working day10. If no physician treats the bite, the bitten adult, or the parent or guardian of a bitten child, must report it by the end of the next working day10. The Department of Public Health repeats that duty on its reporting page12. The South Carolina Department of Public Health takes reports through county offices, an after-hours line and an online form11,12.
The county health department serves notice on the owner of a dog, cat or ferret that bit or attacked a person to quarantine it for at least 10 days, at the owner's expense, on the owner's premises or at a shelter or other place named in the notice10. A veterinarian or rabies control officer may examine the animal at any time, daily if desired, and no one may obstruct that10. Refusing to comply is a misdemeanor tried in magistrate's court10.
Dangerous-dog hearings, euthanasia orders and criminal penalties are covered on South Carolina dangerous dog law.
Questions about South Carolina dog bite law
Is South Carolina a one-bite state?
No. The Supreme Court abandoned the one-bite rule in Hossenlopp v. Cannon in 1985, and § 47-3-110, enacted in 1986, makes the owner or keeper liable without any proof the dog had bitten before or that the owner knew it was dangerous1,2. The victim must have been in a public place or lawfully on private property and must not have provoked the dog1.
Does the law cover a dog that knocks someone down without biting?
The statute applies when a person is "bitten or otherwise attacked"1. An attack that knocks someone down is covered even with no bite. A dog that injures someone through play, such as jumping up in greeting, is less clearly an attack, and no published South Carolina appellate decision found for this page settles that; such cases can be brought in negligence1,2.
Can I sue the owner if a dog sitter or kennel was watching the dog?
Yes. The Supreme Court held in Harris (2009) that a person injured by a dog may sue the owner even when the dog was in another person's care or keeping, and the keeper is also liable under the statute3.
My child was bitten by the neighbor's dog in a rental house. Is the landlord liable?
Usually not. South Carolina courts hold that a landlord is not liable for a tenant's dog, even when the landlord knew it was dangerous and could have ended the lease4,5. The claim runs against the dog's owner or keeper, and the child has until the later of three years after the bite or the 19th birthday to sue1,7.
What if a police dog bit me?
Since 2013 a police dog is exempt from § 47-3-110 only if all six statutory conditions are met, including that the handler's command was lawful, the force was not excessive and the person bitten was not a bystander1. A claim against a sheriff's office or city goes under the Tort Claims Act, with a two-year deadline (three if a verified claim is filed first) and a $300,000 per-person cap8.
Official contacts
| Office | For |
|---|---|
| South Carolina Department of Public Health, rabies program1-888-847-0902 | Rabies and animal bite reporting (county offices; nights, weekends and holidays option 2) |
| South Carolina Department of Public Health, Animal Bite Incident Report | Online bite report form |
| South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 47, Chapter 3 | Official text of the dog bite and dangerous-animal statutes |
Sources
- S.C. Code Title 47, Chapter 3 (Animals: §§ 47-3-20, -50, -110, -710 to -770), South Carolina Legislature. Checked 17 October 2026.
- Nesbitt v. Lewis, 335 S.C. 441, 517 S.E.2d 11 (Ct. App. 1999), Op. No. 2978, South Carolina Judicial Branch. Checked 17 October 2026.
- Harris v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office, 381 S.C. 357, 673 S.E.2d 423 (2009), Animal Legal & Historical Center, Michigan State University College of Law. Checked 17 October 2026.
- Bruce v. Durney, 341 S.C. 563, 534 S.E.2d 720 (Ct. App. 2000), Op. No. 3208, South Carolina Judicial Branch. Checked 17 October 2026.
- Fair v. United States, Op. No. 24905 (S.C. Feb. 22, 1999), South Carolina Judicial Branch. Checked 17 October 2026.
- Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation, Op. No. 24850 (S.C. 1998), quoting Nelson v. Concrete Supply Co. (1991), South Carolina Judicial Branch. Checked 17 October 2026.
- S.C. Code Title 15, Chapter 3 (§§ 15-3-40, 15-3-530), South Carolina Legislature. Checked 17 October 2026.
- S.C. Code Title 15, Chapter 78, Tort Claims Act (§§ 15-78-110, -120), South Carolina Legislature. Checked 17 October 2026.
- S.C. Code Title 15, Chapter 32 (§ 15-32-530, punitive damages), South Carolina Legislature. Checked 17 October 2026.
- S.C. Code Title 47, Chapter 5, Rabies Control (§§ 47-5-90, -100, -200), South Carolina Legislature. Checked 17 October 2026.
- Rabies, South Carolina Department of Public Health. Checked 17 October 2026.
- Rabies Contacts and Reporting, South Carolina Department of Public Health. Checked 17 October 2026.